Tuesday, 25 September 2012

Young London at V22

23 September – 11 November 2012

V22 Workspace
F-Block
The Biscuit Factory

On exiting the tube station at Bermondsey there's one massive escalator that takes you from the platform to the station level. Unusual for a London underground station is the way it takes you up in such a stately fashion, through what can only be described as a massive concrete cathedral. However, unlike the impressive and peerless structures of the gothic architects, where stone was made to appear weightless, you feel very acutely the massive bulk of the walls, the tremendous force that they hold up, and the thick steel reinforcement that keeps the soil and whatever else composes the substrata of London at bay. And it makes me feel a sense of awe as I consider the sublime glory of man and machine against the simple weight of the natural world. In this open cavernous immensity I find myself thinking 'and that is how far underground I am', for once able to have a sense of place, or at least a sense of my place as I journey through the thick of things.

Entrance of V22

What a fitting start then, to an evening which involves not just cavernous post-industrial spaces, of which V22 is an excellent example, but of getting a rare sense of one’s overall place in the matrix of new contemporary art in London. Housed in an old biscuit factory, the exhibition halls are one side of a massive converted studio complex. Approaching the small, non-descript entrance it’s hard not to feel dwarfed by the featureless bricked façade. I cannot emphasise enough how much the character of the space impacts the feel of the exhibition. This is far from a white cube, and the scale, drab materiality and sense of emptiness left by something that was once there, provide an arresting backdrop to the artwork.


The exhibition is comprised of an entrance hall (including a ‘Fashion line and concept store’ by LuckyPDF), and two enormous rooms, almost equally divided between darkened space showing video and projection, and space for sculpture and installation, but apparently not painting! The closest we come to any painting is the large scale wall works by Aaron Angell of geometrical shapes comprised of torn paper ‘collage’. However, it’s also true that this is a space that isn’t really made for painting, such that its omission could be put down to a ‘it’s not you it’s me’ kind of excuse.

Entrance Hall, No Fixed Abode's Sun and
 Moon Futures
in background

LuckyPDF, S/S 2013 Young London Collection
View of exhibition hall
A collage by Aaron Angell

I’m left wondering what the aim of the show is. Is it to showcase the ‘best’ art that is being made by young emerging artists in London, or is it to put forward a vision of what one wishes the London art scene to become? In this type of exhibition I keep thinking about how what is omitted betrays the un-ascribed curatorial vision behind it. No figurative work, except for the appearance of people in videos. And this is not a group who is concerned with anything overtly to do with politics, or current events.  I saw instead an emphasis on abstract texture and colouration. Whether it was the pieces of torn photocopied paper wrapped around structures (which ended up creating the illusion of slabs of marble) by Peles Empire, Samara Scott’s mixed media sculpture, or even the patterned clothing produced by LuckyPDF, repetition and materiality was present. I also would consider Sophie Michael’s Chapters One to Five (2012) 16mm projection as part of this trend, for her use of intense colouring and patterns.


Detail of A33D 1-4 by Peles Empire

Detail of work by Samara Scott

Still from Sophie Michael's Chapters One to Five 

Detail of fabric at LuckyPDF


I really enjoyed the enormous video space, and I thought that the large projections by Ciarán Ó Dochartaigh, Hans Diernberger and David Swan were especially effective. Ó Dochartiagh’s Spigotty Anglease (Odradek)(2011) was mesmerising. It featured a close-up view of a fishing lure appearing as decadent and sumptuous as a precious jewel, as well as shots of the dynamic flinging curves of a line against a backdrop of green.  


Still from Ciarán Ó Dochartaigh's Spigotty Anglease (Odradek)

The smaller works on monitors got lost in the space, and I suspect could have benefited from more controlled viewing. Minae Kim’s Behind the Scene (2012) (which I first mistook for lighting), conveniently emitted a soft yellow light over the entire space, and appeared like a beacon amongst the darkness.

Benedict Drew's installation NOW, THING
Also of note was Hans Diernberger’s large-scale video projection Jupiter (2009) which shows a man in a suit standing on ice in front of an industrial fan. Every minute or so the fan turns on and the suited gentleman is seemingly pushed many metres away by the gale-force wind.  The projection is large enough to be life-sized and I chose to see this rhythmic expulsion as metaphorical of the distancing of issues to do with the body or society. This human represented in this video is a concept, rather than a specificity.Benedict Drew showed NOW, THING (2012) an installation with video projection, guitar amps and a snare drum which also very humorously viewed the human as an object among objects, as opposed to assigning him a special status.


I was disarmed by Samara Scott’s collection of air fresheners. Anchored next to a column, they became a jarringly domestic intervention in the space, both in their diminutive scale and with their faint scent of ‘happy clean home/flower garden’ that contrasted brilliantly against the grey, concrete floors. I was drawn to her palette of pastel pinks, oranges and powdery blues on her other sculptures.


Air fresheners, part of Samara Scott's me time 
Part of Samara Scott's installation

As I think back to the show, I am left feeling as if I have just seen a degree show.  There is so much work that is speaking to different concerns that has been placed together, in a perhaps aesthetically intriguing way, but not necessarily with intention and respect for the practices of each artist. It is a mash-up at best, full of ‘interesting moments’ but quite difficult to pin down as a whole.

What is the relevance of this show? What does it say about the world? What is Young London? Well, they are poor. They use cheap, often low status, materials. They use video, probably for the same reason, to greater effect (especially HD). They are done with issues of representation, have no use for gender politics or social issues at large, but are extremely sensitive to the fragile and beautiful character of the world around them, or at least the world accessible to them. They re-use, they salvage (No Fixed Abode, Sun and Moon Futures, 2012) and set up their own shops (LuckyPDF).

In focusing on materiality though, I feel as if an opportunity for the work to take on greater significance has been lost. Arresting and pretty though many of the pieces were, they didn’t challenge my perceptions about the world, or make me feel uncomfortable or questioning of my place in it. At a time when so much social unrest is happening, when we are being confronted with many important questions about how to move forward, where are the voices proposing a new future? Unfortunately, I fear they may be broke. In this modern-day cathedral created out of the death of industry, the revolution still waits. 




No comments:

Post a Comment